Assembly did follow disciplinary procedures

The article titled "Lax assembly ­discipline irks chief whip Stone Sizani" (November 29) cast aspersions on Parliament and is simply incorrect. Regrettably, statements were left as fact because Parliament was not approached to verify them.

Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Tina Joemat-Pettersson lodged a complaint with the speaker of the National Assembly, Max Sisulu, about two members of the assembly, one from the ANC and one from the Democratic Alliance. The two had allegedly made derogatory remarks about her on October 9 at a meeting of the portfolio committee on agriculture, forestry and ­fisheries, which she attended.

The minister, in her complaint dated October 14, asked the speaker to intervene. This the speaker did. He referred the minister's complaint to the National Assembly's powers and privileges committee, as required by the rules. In his referral of October 22, the speaker asked the committee to assess the complaint and to report to the House on its findings and recommendations.

The committee was created in terms of the Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act of 2004 and a number of National Assembly rules regulate its operations.

It may consider any matter referred to it by the speaker relating to contempt of Parliament or misconduct by a member of the assembly.

The National Assembly may take disciplinary action against a member after the committee has investigated the alleged misconduct and reported its findings and recommendations to the House.

Also on October 22, the speaker wrote letters to the chief whip of the majority party, Stone Sizani, and the parliamentary leader of the opposition, Lindiwe Mazibuko, stating the seriousness of the complaint and informing them of its referral to the powers and privileges committee. Their attention was drawn to the procedure to be followed in assessing the complaint, and they were asked to deal with the allegations against their members in terms of their particular party's internal processes regulating members' conduct.

The statement in the Mail & Guardian, boldly declaring that "the institution under whose auspices the portfolio committee was conducting its business has done nothing up to now", is incorrect and unfortunate.

A simple call to verify this information by the reporter, who happens to be based in Parliament, could have clarified this point immediately.

It is not the first time that this kind of conduct has occurred, in which the office of the speaker is not contacted for comment on matters that relate directly to the National Assembly.

Luzuko Jacobs is the spokesperson for Parliament.

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Related stories


Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Latest stories

Roads flooded, buildings washed away in latest Durban downpour

No deaths have been reported after mudslides caused by heavy weekend rains

Nthikeng Mohlele comes up short with ‘The Discovery of Love’

The talented novelist Nthikeng Mohlele’s debut short-story collection lacks the vitality that makes short stories magical

What is at the root of white anxiety in post-apartheid...

Some white people think any discussion of racism or its legacy is an attempt to shame or condemn them for the ‘sin’ of their whiteness

OPINION| ANC’s socialist thinking is crushing South Africa’s future

The Cold War ended more than three decades ago. That period of history showed that socialism, at a country scale, is unsustainable

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…