Eskom rewards bosses for fine job

Eskom paid R24.4-million to its three senior executives last year, and rewarded its top brass with R62.8-million in performance bonuses since load-shedding first shut down South Africa’s gold mines in January 2008.

As businesses across the country stumble because of the effects of the electricity crisis, costs associated with power plants Medupi and Kusile continue to mount, and taxpayers are shaken by the reality that they may have to bail out the struggling power utility, Eskom’s board awarded its decision-makers with generous salaries and millions of rands in performance incentives.

Last year exiting chief executive Brian Dames took away R15.4-million. This included a termination payment of just over R5-million and three years’ worth of back pay for award performance shares and deferred bonus shares.

The payments had been put on hold, pending the outcome of an independent investigation into the remuneration policy of state-owned enterprises. In 2013 Dames took home R8.46-million.

Chief financial officer Paul O’Flaherty earned R5.89-million during the 2014 financial year. His package included back payments and a R3.27-million termination fee. The year before he took home R5.97-million.

Eskom’s current financial director, Tsholofelo Molefe, earned R3.17-million in the same year.

Although the executive directors received the greatest share of the compensation, the salaries of Eskom’s group executives – the next tier in seniority – ranged from R3.3-million to R4.8-million in 2014. The group of seven earned R28.6-million in 2014; in 2013, eight group executives earned a total of R36.6-million.

Eskom’s total payment to its senior band of employees (directors and group executives) in 2014 was R60.15-million; in 2013 it was R57.5-million.

‘In line with the market’
The power utility says the pay of senior executives goes through a transparent approval process. “As a state-owned company, Eskom … makes a recommendation on the chief executive to the shareholder minister for approval,” it said. The remuneration of all other executives is approved by the board.

Eskom says its level of remuneration is in line with the market. “International and local benchmarks are considered to ensure that executive packages are aligned with those offered by companies of similar stature to Eskom. We aim to remunerate so that we can recruit and retain the best management team to lead our business.”

Executive pay is made up of a guaranteed pay package of a fixed cash portion, medical aid and pension; short-term incentives that reward the individual on the achievement of set objectives and targets; and a long-term incentive scheme.

The latter allows shares to vest at the end of a three-year period, “only if, and to the extent that, targets are met”, according to Eskom’s 2014 Integrated Report. Targets are set in “financial and nonfinancial” areas.

They include: ensuring the business sustainability of Eskom; ensuring reliability of electricity supply to all South Africans; ensuring that the future power needs for South Africa are adequately provided for; and supporting the developmental objectives of South Africa.

Depending on how well the targets have been met, shares will vest at between 0% and 100%. If all conditions are met, the shares will vest at 50%.

For the 2014 financial year, shares vested at a rate of 53.48%, meaning that senior executives exceeded the targets in the conditions outlined. According to the report, this is “due to the achievement of nonfinancial performance conditions”.

Between 2008 and 2014, Eskom paid out R62.8-million in such performance shares to executive directors and members of the executive committee.

Eskom has defended its overall remuneration strategy as one that holds up to scrutiny at all levels. “The executive remuneration strategy is constantly reviewed to stay abreast of best practices,” it said.

“The incentives will vary depending on the individual and the organisation’s performance. The balance between fixed and variable remuneration and short- and long-term incentives is reviewed annually.”

Subscribe to the M&G for R2 a month

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

And for this weekend only, you can become a subscriber by paying just R2 a month for your first three months.

Thalia Holmes
Thalia Holmes

Thalia is a freelance business reporter for the Mail & Guardian. She grew up in Swaziland and lived in the US before returning to South Africa.

She got a cum laude degree in marketing and followed it with another in English literature and psychology before further confusing things by becoming a black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) consultant.

After spending five years hearing the surprised exclamation, "But you're white!", she decided to pursue her latent passion for journalism, and joined the M&G in 2012. 

The next year, she won the Brandhouse Journalist of the Year Award, the Brandhouse Best Online Award and was chosen as one of five finalists from Africa for the German Media Development Award. In 2014, she and a colleague won the Standard Bank Sivukile Multimedia Award. 

She now writes and edits for various publications, but her heart still belongs to the M&G.     

Related stories

Editorial: Crocodile tears from the coalface

Pumping limited resources into a project that is predominantly meant to extend dirty coal energy in South Africa is not what local communities and the climate needs.

ANC: ‘We’re operating under conditions of anarchy’

In its latest policy documents, the ANC is self-critical and wants ‘consequence management’, yet it’s letting its members off the hook again

‘We struggle for water, but power stations and coal mines don’t’

A proposed pipeline will bring water polluted with Gauteng’s sewage to the Waterberg in Limpopo to boost the coal industry during the climate crisis

The solar energy market will grow if innovative business models are developed

Southern African suppliers should consider entering into partnerships with financiers to offer off-grid, hybrid and prepaid solutions to customers

Eskom’s emissions are not compatible with the South African constitution

The government must not cave to Eskom’s demand that it be exempt from air pollution rules. Furthermore, the power utility needs to stay true to the principles of its own just transition strategy

Ramaphosa: We want investment pledges to translate into new jobs

To move out of South Africa’s economic funk, Ramaphosa is prioritising the materialisation of pledges made at the previous investment conferences.

Subscribers only

ANC: ‘We’re operating under conditions of anarchy’

In its latest policy documents, the ANC is self-critical and wants ‘consequence management’, yet it’s letting its members off the hook again

Q&A Sessions: ‘I think I was born way before my...

The chief executive of the Estate Agency Affairs Board and the deputy chair of the SABC board, shares her take on retrenchments at the public broadcaster and reveals why she hates horror movies

More top stories

DRC: Tshisekedi and Kabila fall out

The country’s governing coalition is under strain, which could lead to even more acrimony ahead

Editorial: Crocodile tears from the coalface

Pumping limited resources into a project that is predominantly meant to extend dirty coal energy in South Africa is not what local communities and the climate needs.

Klipgat residents left high and dry

Flushing toilets were installed in backyards in the North West, but they can’t be used because the sewage has nowhere to go

Nehawu leaders are ‘betraying us’

The accusation by a branch of the union comes after it withdrew from a parliamentary process

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…