To enjoy the full Mail & Guardian online experience: please upgrade your browser
15 May 2015 15:57
Xenphobic violence can't be treated as an isolated event or as South Africa’s unique problem. It is systemic and regional in nature. (Fredrik Lerneryd, M&G)
The violence against foreign nationals that recently swept across South Africa once
again highlights core questions of identity, nation and what it means to be
African. I have followed the news and read several commentaries.
and Trevor Ncube have been among the brave non-South African voices that made a
contribution based on their experiences of the different manifestations of
xenophobia — or Afrophobia, as they would like to call it.
and others have been very helpful to those of us tracking issues from afar, but
I feel that there is still something that is not being discussed. The dominant
arguments on the matter don’t challenge us to collectively face this problem. They
they do not necessarily hear the concerns of other.
think the South African brothers and sisters who took to the streets and
engaged in violence against foreign nationals have some form of grievance. There
is a need for a genuine audience to listen and take up their issues.
starting point is that the acts of violence are committed in the name of jobs
and economic wellbeing. Foreign nationals are seen as getting too much of the
national cake, at the expense of South Africans. We need to look at patterns of
production and accumulation and see how foreign nationals have historically
contributed to the South Africa economy — if they did.
South Africa has benefited from migrant labour, especially on the farms and
mines. Labour-recruiting stations for South African mines were established
across the sub-region. Migrant labour was mostly underpaid; it was not accorded
the rights and privileges that the unions demand today.
official process of recruiting foreign nationals to serve the needs of mines
and farms may no longer exist, but it continues by informal means and continues
to serve the goal of capital — profit maximisation. Today we have the massive
exploitation of labour, with disastrous consequences, as seen at Marikana.
attempt to look at acts of violence against foreign nationals living in
townships as separate from struggles for better pay and better jobs is
misguided. There is a close relationship, but there is a gap in articulation, mostly
because of the way the working poor are organised or disorganised. It is the
logic of capital accumulation that should be under scrutiny.
do businesses prefer to employ foreigners? Not because they work better — that
is just patronising. It’s because they are not unionised, and can easily be
underpaid because they have no recourse.
South Africa attained freedom in 1994, expectations were high that with the end
of colonisation and apartheid the sub-region was now ready for integration.
Indeed, by then, the Southern African Development Community (SADC) had become a
model of integration for other sub-regions, such as the East African and the
West African blocs. Instead, efforts towards economic integration in Southern
Africa slowed down.
Africa has played a major role in the sub-region, but its focus has mostly been
on ensuring stability by facilitating dialogues, quelling coups and
peacekeeping. Pretoria’s budget for diplomacy across sub-Saharan Africa is
probably the biggest of any country on the continent. But South Africa has not
focused on social and regional integration, which was originally the hope of
the frontline states; rather, South Africa has sought to ensure stability to
allow business to operate with no disruptions.
Africa is a sub-imperial force and an important intermediary for international
capital. It has long worked by that logic, ensuring that the sub-region has
peace and stability, intervening where its economic interests are under threat,
as in Lesotho. It has not taken advantage of its advanced economy to pursue a model
of regional integration that would ensure wider, equitable growth. Instead,
working closely with the representatives of capital, it has pursued and
defended its own economic interests.
of Jacob Zuma’s first trips into Africa as president of South Africa was to Angola
and the Democratic Republic of Congo. It is telling that he was accompanied by
businessmen with interests in mining and agriculture. Since the late 1990s,
South Africa has financed shopping malls housing mostly South African retail
shops and supermarkets, which have become a permanent landmark not only in
Southern Africa but all the way to Accra, Ghana.
the extractive sector, mining houses owned by or aligned to South African have
pursued a similar model, extracting primary commodities but with limited
reinvestment in downstream and sidestream value chains. In some cases,
companies use mostly South African labour on six-week rotations. In brief,
South African companies have pursued a model of foreign direct investment in
the rest of Africa, without reforming the model or attending to the concerns of
their fellow Africans.
African countries are currently experiencing very limited prospects of growth in
national savings. This is because, despite widespread GDP growth, the share resources
going to locals is insignificant, thanks to investors like South African
companies who are quick to repatriate their profits.
laments the fact that South Africa did not play a decisive role in constraining
Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe. I see it another way: that was probably never South
Africa’s objective. Instead, they had huge economic interests to protect. One
of the immediate outcomes of the South African-negotiated Government of
National Unity was the awarding of a contract to resurface Zimbabwe’s major
highway from Plumtree to Mutare via Bulawayo and Harare. The contract was
awarded, without going to tender, on a build, operate and transfer basis, to
South Africans — despite the fact that there had been a consortium of local
businesses asking government for a similar deal.
am sure there are many other cases across the continent. I would like to submit
to South Africa’s president that the answer to his question is that these are
chickens merely coming back home to roost. If the economies near South Africa’s
are not growing, labour will continue to flock to Egoli.
be fair, South Africa is not entirely responsible for the mess we are in. The
governance records of many African countries leave a lot to be desired. But
that does not affect my main argument about the role of South Africa on the
continent and in particular Southern Africa. I have said that South Africa is a
sub-imperial power, meaning that it does not have the capacity of an imperial
power like the United States, for instance, but is in a position to act as an
intermediary for imperial powers.
Africa is a member of the Brics group not just because it is an economic
powerhouse but because it has the capacity, to quote South African Airways, to
“take Africa to the world and the world to Africa”. It provides an excellent
launching pad for many would-be investors into Africa, taking advantage of South
Africa’s influential position in both SADC and also at the African Union to
ensure a conducive business environment. South Africa has chosen to subordinate
itself to the dictates of international capital and to preserve the status quo
beyond its borders on behalf of business, rather than being the champion of the
what is to be done? The first imperative is to create jobs — honestly, this is
a no-brainer. The doomsday prophecies of the collapse of the rand will always
be there, but without the ANC taking a lead on being a developmental state it
can only work on the margins, tinkering with welfare reforms, which in
themselves may inhibit economic growth. Beyond that, I will not get into the
murky waters of national economic policies.
the SADC is engaged in an attempt to roll out an industrialisation strategy.
Although it has not yet been expressed officially, everyone knows that its
success or failure will rest with South Africa. Is South Africa interested in a
programme to assist member countries to industrialise, which may reduce their
dependence on goods imported from South Africa? We will see.
creation and roll-out of an industrialisation strategy that benefits from
agriculture and mining could create millions of job across the sub-region,
lessening the lure of crossing the Limpopo in search of greener pastures. South
Africa’s goal should be to help African countries grow their productive
capacities — in other words, create incentives for people to stay in their
violence can’t be treated as an isolated event or as South Africa’s unique
problem. It is systemic and regional in nature; those calling for a conference
or summit on issue are absolutely right. South Africa’s current diplomatic
efforts (sending ministers to different African capitals) is commendable, but it’s
short-term. In the absence of a coherent South African and regional strategy,
this is like patching together a badly damaged road — just wait for the next
rains and see what happens.
time, it may not just be the seven lives we have counted in this round.
Create Account | Lost Your Password?