Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Writing a wrong is a bitter irony

Nothing destroys one’s enjoyment of and confidence in a work of nonfiction more than coming across factual howlers. If that’s in a field about which you know something, scepticism (always a useful reading companion) turns to cynicism (never a good helpmate).

Perusing Say Again? The Other Side of South African English by Jean Branford and Malcolm Venter (Pharos), I was dismayed to find misinformation about Chinese and black economic empowerment (BEE). Let me disclose upfront that I am Eurasian, with Chinese ancestors on both sides of my family.

The incorrect material appears on page 133, in a section about the term “honorary white”, and reads: “In a recent twist (our local version of ‘Chinese Checkers’?), the Chinese in South Africa, who were not accorded this advantage, have – as a result of the growing trade between Africa and China – been accorded the advantage of being classified ‘black’ for the purposes of Black Economic Empowerment!”

There are several errors here and, possibly worse, an egregious example of Orientalism at work. To deal first with the mistakes. One, it is not “Chinese in South Africa” who are deemed to be black for purposes of BEE, but South African-born Chinese. If BEE status were to be extended to all people of Chinese ethnicity currently in the country, then hundreds of thousands would be eligible.

As it stands, about 8 000 are “advantaged”, but the many so-called new Chinese, post-1994 immigrants, are not. And, indeed, how could they be, whether in law or by common-sense reasoning?

Two, South Africa might think of itself as an imperial power in Africa and often behaves as such in its trade and other dealings with the continent, but the South African government would not grant a national “advantage” (BEE status) on the basis of a continental trend (“the growing trade between Africa and China”).

But that is only part of what’s wrong. The high court in Pretoria ruled in 2008 that South African-born Chinese were excluded from the apartheid economy and thus for purposes of BEE and broad-based BEE they should be deemed to be “black”. Where was the editor at Pharos, the reader’s friend and protector, the last gatekeeper against error?

What I find even more unsettling is that oh-so-unwitty “(our local version of ‘Chinese Checkers’?)”. This really is the other side, as in othering a race group. To me it smacks of Orientalism (whites and the West normative; non-whites and the non-West aberrant).

Worse still, it’s a false analogue and a lazy stereotype. Chinese chequers (surely in South African English it should be “chequers” rather than the American English “checkers”?) did not originate in China.

This simplistic draughts-like board game for two, four or six players developed from a game called halma and became popular in the United States in the 1930s (hence “checkers”). It has none of the subtlety and complexity of ancient Chinese board games such as weichi or weiqui (“the surrounding game”, better known by its Japanese name Go) or the simpler xiangqi, Chinese chess, which is akin to a mashup of draughts and chess.

Say again?

Subscribe for R500/year

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them and get a 57% discount in your first year.

Darryl Accone
Darryl Accone
Darryl Accone has been in journalism for the best part of four decades. He is also a Fellow of the Salzburg Seminar and the International Writers Workshop of Hong Kong Baptist University and the author of ‘All Under Heaven: The Story of a Chinese Family in South Africa’ and ‘Euripides Must Die’.

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Subscribers only

‘The children cannot cope any more’: Suicide in Calvinia highlights...

How Covid-19 has intensified the physical and emotional burdens placed on children’s shoulders.

Capitec Bank flies high above Viceroy’s arrow

The bank took a knock after being labelled a loan shark by the short seller, but this has not stymied its growth

More top stories

Farmers squeezed by big retailers

It may be beneficial for consumers when supermarkets push to get the lowest price from suppliers, but it can harm the farmers

Sisters pave the way with ecobricks

The durable bricks are made from 30% recycled plastic, some of which they collect from a network of 50 waste pickers

If the inflation-driving supply strain in the US lasts, it...

In South Africa, a strong trade surplus, buoyed by robust commodity prices, will cushion our economy against pressure arising from US policy

Covid-19: No vaccine booster shots needed yet

Scientists agree it is important to get most of the population vaccinated before giving booster jabs
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×