South Africa prioritises fossil fuels over clean energy in post-Covid-19 recovery packages

COMMENT

As the negative economic effect of the Covid-19 crisis becomes increasingly clear, many countries have announced stimulus measures to steady their economies. International leaders, including the United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres and the International Energy Agency (IEA), have warned that if these measures lock in fossil fuel use, then the immediate threat of Covid-19 could undermine efforts to address climate change. South Africa, like many countries, appears to be making such a mistake. This has prompted 14 global organisations to collaborate to track real-time data on public finance for energy around the world.

Initial data from this research project made public last week shows that, in South Africa, stimulus directed at fossil fuels exceeds stimulus directed at clean energy sources by a large margin. The research, led by the International Institute for Sustainable Development, seeks to provide government, media, nongovernmental organisations and others a searchable, neutral and nuanced database of government policies committing public money to fossil, clean or other energy in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. This is available on EnergyPolicyTracker.Org and will be updated as governments continue to approve stimulus and recovery packages.

At the global level, researchers found that between the start of the coronavirus pandemic and July 22, G20 countries had cumulatively committed about $160.95-billion to fossil fuels, at least $123.75-billion to clean energy and $27-billion to “other energy”. Analysis of the data shows that the Covid-19 pandemic largely cemented policy trends that predate the pandemic. For example, countries on a fossil fuel-intensive trajectory (and heavily subsidised the associated industries) continued to follow this trend in their post-Covid-19 recovery and stimulus packages. In contrast, many countries that were already shifting to clean energy have capitalised on recovery packages.

In South Africa there have been a wealth of proposals but few confirmed policies and measures. As of the end of July 21 the tracker has identified only one that was readily quantifiable, namely the overpayment for coal contracts leading to R5-billion ($302-million) of payments to coal producers. Other pro-fossil policies included Eskom curtailing wind energy (despite a Government Notice issued in March classifying renewable energy producers as essential services during lockdown), the deferral of the first carbon tax payment and Minister Barbara Creecy lowering minimum emission standards for sulphur dioxide, which primarily benefits Eskom and Sasol, at the cost of public health. This is a crucial misstep for South Africa, as our actions today will either usher in a new course of sustainable development or further entrench the already carbon-intensive economy at the cost of equity, human health, the environment and long-term economic stability. 

To date only one approved measure, an announcement increasing access to information on industrial pollution, can be said to support clean energy in South Africa. A number of other measures have been proposed but not yet implemented. One such example is the proposal for a green infrastructure bond to the value of R1.5-trillion to kickstart investment in energy projects (among other infrastructure projects), which President Cyril Ramaphosa announced last month at the inaugural Sustainable Infrastructure Development Symposium of South Africa. 


Outside the energy space, the majority of stimulus and recovery packages have been fiscal measures providing support to the unemployed, grant beneficiaries, employees who have lost a portion of their income, and small and medium-sized enterprises. 

The tracker shows that on the whole, there is a failure to recognise the economic benefits of a green recovery plan. The business-as-usual approach to fossil fuel intensive recovery packages is not only detrimental to the future of South Africa’s energy sector, but is also incongruent with the 2019 Integrated Resource Plan and the National Development Plan 2030, which place renewables and decarbonising the economy at the forefront of the energy agenda. Although a green recovery post-Covid-19 is not a panacea for all of our country’s challenges, recovery must address the energy crisis. The rhetoric of a green recovery is already prevalent in the country, and has been endorsed and supported by The South African National Energy Development Institute, The South African Wind Energy Association, civil society and commercial banks. It’s time for stimulus policies to live up to the rhetoric and reflect a commitment to supporting clean energy over fossil fuels.

Chido Muzondo is an energy policy consultant and Richard Bridle is a senior policy adviser at the nonprofit International Institute for Sustainable Development.

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Chido Muzondo
Chido Muzondo is an energy policy consultant
Richard Bridle
Richard Bridle is a senior policy adviser at the nonprofit International Institute for Sustainable Development.

Related stories

There are useful lessons to learn from the generation of the 1986 emergency

The parents of the 2020 crisis have little say about their children’s education

Miss Rona’s teaching the 4IR lessons

Schooling is stuck in the 1950s, but technology must be blended with the basics of education

Caring for students goes beyond the teaching project

The Covid-19 pandemic gives universities an opportunity to find new ways of ensuring the health and well-being of students

Teachers trying to catch up, ‘ticking boxes’, overloading learners

Teachers who spoke to the Mail & Guardian this week are not confident that any effective teaching and learning will take place during this academic year, even if it is extended

Covid-19 is taking its toll on people’s state of mind

The future is uncertain, and the number of people suffering from anxiety and depression is rising

‘I will have to repeat grade 8’

Schools have been closed again. After months of doing schoolwork at home, not all parents think their children are ready to move to the next grade
Advertising

Ingonyama Trust Board moves to retrench staff

More than 50 workers at the Ingonyama Trust Board have been issued section 189 notices

No proof of Covid-19 reinfection, yet

Some people report testing positive for Covid-19 after initially having the disease and then testing negative. Scientists are still trying to understand if this means that reinfection is possible
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday