Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Racism has a physical impact on the black body

I began to write this essay in January 2020 ­— and it feels like years ago. The issues I wanted to raise are no longer even partly hidden. The effects of racism on the body, especially the black body, are in plain sight.

Most of these problems have been there for centuries, but are now called pandemics. Pandemics of murder, of disease and of social in­equality. In the face of new waves of deaths, including those that precipitated the Black Lives Matter movement, the world is reawakening to the power of racism to kill people.

The Effects of Race Project at the Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study started in 2013. The goal of a team of academics was to better understand the “everydayness of race” and how race-thinking created durable and seemingly inescapable racialised realities in South Africa, the United States and elsewhere.

Race thinking — the idea that people belong to a race determined mostly by their skin colour — has so framed our realities that we can scarcely imagine a world without it.

But race thinking has deformed us and society because it’s based on constructs of otherness and difference. These, in turn, underpin expectations of character, intelligence, motivation and behaviour. They can pave the way for suspicion, derogation and dehumanisation.

We now know in greater and more disturbing detail how racism affects health and often leads to early death. It kills directly when people are murdered by police or vigilantes, but it also kills through disease. Covid-19 is new, but diseases common to the survival zones of the urban poor have been with us for a long time. Only a century ago rickets was so common among African American children of eastern US cities that it was considered a rite of passage.

More sinister even are the health problems caused by acute and chronic stress on people who are subjected to racial othering and overt racial discrimination. The trauma of humiliation caused by racism creates recurrent stress in individuals, families and wider communities and often transcends generations.

Racism operates at multiple levels to negatively affect health. Physical violence and rampant infectious diseases are the tip of the iceberg. Institutional racism negatively affects access to health services and healthy lifestyle choices by creating neighbourhoods or districts where people cannot thrive. 

And when members of stigmatised racial populations respond to the pervasive negative racial stereotypes by accepting as true the dominant society’s beliefs about their biological and cultural inferiority, they can internalise the racism. Internalised racism manifests itself in many ways. It leads to lower self-esteem and less psychological well-being.

When people are worried, day in and day out, about their safety, their future, and how they are being perceived by others because of racism, they experience stress and anxiety from recurrent humiliation. These effects are not transient, nor “merely” psychological.

What is epigenetics? 

The social context in which a child lives is a powerful predictor of their adult health. It can also affect their genes, in ways that are only now being recognised. One of the most disturbing discoveries in the field of epigenetics is how stress can affect the way an individual’s genes work, and that some of the stress-related changes can be inherited.

Epigenetics is the study of changes caused by modification of how genes work rather than by altering the genetic code itself. 

Studies of epigenetic changes can illustrate the specific biological mechanisms by which social 

conditions become physically embodied. What we are now understanding is how feedback loops are established by early life stressors causing negative emotions which cause biochemical and physiological changes. These, in turn, cause changes in behaviour that alter the chemical environment in which genes are being expressed.

The chain of events from genetic modification to behaviour is long and there is no predetermined conclusion, but the mere fact that this can happen is profoundly disturbing. That some of the genetic changes may be inherited is even more so.

What to do about it

When we grasp the reality that human bodies and genes are being constantly remodelled by the physical and social environment and by life experience, the inescapable conclusion is that we must fight the origins of health disparity at their root, in the early social environment and life experiences of every person.

The development of a healthy citizenry depends on people growing up with adequate nutrition, protected from violence, gross insecurity and humiliation, and raised in environments conducive to the development of emotional security. 

We have known for a long time that poverty, poor nutrition, child abuse, trauma and fear were bad for health. What epigenetic research offers is the shedding of light on the biological pathways through which such exposures are translated into concrete, measurable, increased risks of various diseases such as bipolar disease, asthma, adverse birth outcomes and the problem of decreased longevity.

Understanding how genes are differentially regulated by experience will affect how we conceptualise social inequalities and health disparities. Rather than engaging in outdated “nature vs nurture” debates concerning race as a genetic or social construct, considering race as an epigenomic construct may be the most accurate and appropriate perspective yet.

The “real world” is the one in which we understand genes and the socially experienced world as perpetually entwined in the human body.

This is an edited version of an article that was first published in The Conversation. It is part of a series that has been running for seven months. Other authors include Barney Pityana, Göran Therborn, Njabulo Ndebele, George Chaplin, Kira Erwin and Kathryn Pillay.The three edited volumes of essays published by African Sun Media in 2018 (The Effects of Race, edited by Nina G. Jablonski and Gerhard Maré), 2019 (Race in Education, edited by Gerhard Maré), and 2020 (Persistence of Race, edited by Nina G Jablonski) contain the complete representation of the project’s scholarship.

The Conversation

Subscribe for R500/year

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them and get a 57% discount in your first year.

Nina G. Jablonski
Nina G. Jablonski is Evan Pugh University Professor of Anthropology at The Pennsylvania State University. A biological anthropologist and paleobiologist, she studies the evolution of adaptations to the environment in Old World primates including humans. Jablonski conducts research on the evolution of primates and humans in relation to the environment. Her research of the primate fossil record draws upon the evidence of comparative anatomy, physiology, and paleoecology in order to understand why primates have evolved in the ways and places where they have. Her research on human evolution is focused on understanding how skin and skin pigmentation have evolved over time and in the course of widespread dispersals. Her research on the evolution of human skin color has grown to include explorations of skin-color-based concepts of human classification, including color-based race and its meanings. Jablonski is the co-convener of the Effects of Race Project, which ran at The Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study from 2013 to 2020. This scholarly initiative was aimed at studying the effects of race in South African and other highly racialized societies. She is also the co-leader of the the development of "genetics and genealogy curriculum project," which has pioneered the utlization of personalized genetic testing and genealogical investigation in informal and formal learning contexts for K-12 learners and undergraduate university students.

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Subscribers only

Hawkish Reserve Bank sees South Africa edge towards a rates...

Analysts say the Reserve Bank could start tightening monetary policy as early as next month

Coko vs S ruling: The case against a subjective test...

Acting judge Tembeka Ngcukaitobi’s acquittal of a rape suspect has raised controversy, but legal experts say the fault lay with legislators and not the court

More top stories

Immunocompromised finally prioritised for Covid-19 booster shots

Organ recipients are at greater risk of death from Covid-19, while waiting lists for transplants grow

Zuma tries to turn his courtroom attack on Downer into...

Jacob Zuma has laid charges claiming that Billy Downer, and the NPA, have irredeemably tainted the arms deal corruption charges that have haunted him since 2005

Top greenhouse gas emitter South Africa earns kudos for new...

The Healthy NDCs Scorecard has recognised South Africa’s efforts in revising its nationally determined contributions to mitigate climate change

Almost 7 000 children receive Pfizer shot on first day...

More than 39 000 young people had registered on the government’s database by 4pm on Wednesday
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×