/ 25 December 2004

France outlaws sexist and anti-gay insults

The French Parliamenet on Thursday definitively adopted legislation that could lead to year-long jail terms for anyone found guilty of insulting homosexuals or women.

The justice minister, Dominique Perben, believes the laws are necessary to combat an increase in homophobia, but they have been condemned by advocates of free speech who say they are too strict and unworkable.

The law puts anti-gay and sexist comments on an equal footing with racist or anti-semitic insults, allowing French courts to hand down fines of up to â,¬45 000 and jail sentences of up to 12 months for ”defamation or incitement to discrimination, hatred or violence on the grounds of a person’s sex or sexual orientation”.

Proferring an anti-gay insult, including any remark ”of a more general nature tending to denigrate homosexuals as a whole”, in public — meaning on air, in print or at a public meeting — is also an imprisonable offence, while private sexist or homophobic taunts between individuals could incur fines of up to â,¬375.

Gay and feminist groups have welcomed the law, which is in part a response to a significant increase in verbal and physical attacks recorded against homosexuals in France.

The number of violent acts against gays doubled to 86 in 2003.

”It’s great and welcome news,” said Ronan Rosec of the campaign group SOS Homophobie.

”Gays in France just do not want to be abused, physically or verbally, any more.”

Another gay rights organisation, Inter-LGBT, said the law marked ”the crossing of a decisive bridge” for France.

The feminist group Les Chiennes de Garde, or Guard Bitches, added that it hoped the law would lead to a fall in the number of physical attacks on women ”by first outlawing verbal violence”.

But the legislation, which also establishes an impartial body, the High Authority against Discrimination and for Equality, to help victims of bias, has drawn as much criticism as praise, particularly from advocates of free speech who say it will be difficult to enforce and will lead to self-censorship.

In theory, critics say, the law could mean that devout Christians who denounce homosexuality as ”deviant” would be prosecuted; comedians can no longer make mother-in-law jokes; the producers and distributors of the camp comedy film La Cage Aux Folles could end up in the dock; and parts of the Old Testament might be banned.

The media campaign group Reporters Without Borders said a society ”advances towards tolerance … via freedom of expression and debate, and not through repression”.

The Catholic church in France also expressed concern that the law might prevent clergymen from expressing their opposition to legalising gay marriage.

Even the national commission on human rights, a government advisory body, has criticised the law, arguing that courts ”will face great difficulty defining what is an insult, and will thus have to condemn words … certain films, books and even the Bible could fall under its remit.”

The Book of Leviticus, for example, describes male homosexuality as ”an abomination”.

In an attempt to allay such fears, Inter-LGBT says it will prosecute only ”genuinely scandalous remarks … cases that we are certain to win, and guaranteeing an educational effect”.

But SOS Homophobie and Act-Up have both said they consider that describing homosexuality as ”abnormal” is an insult under the terms of the new law.

French judges say they expect ”an avalanche” of complaints under the legislation, particularly in its early days, and acknowledge that there are bound to be significant differences of interpretation and appreciation.

”We will have to try to preserve the freedom of expression while respecting the law,” said François Cordier, a Paris public prosecutor.

”Day-to-day insults against gays must be punished, as must incitement to violence, hatred, discrimination. But we cannot deny every monotheistic religion an opinion on homosexuality.”

Cordier said it would take some time before an accepted jurisprudence emerged.

”The courts will have somehow to draw a line between opinions that might be shocking but must be allowed to be expressed in a democracy, and speech that is undeniably homophobic,” he said. ”It will not always be easy.” – Guardian Unlimited Â