/ 26 July 2006

The scourge of drugs in sport

A combination of the money to be made in professional sport and the ”winner-takes-all” mentality makes performance-boosting drugs too alluring for some athletes.

In South Africa, there has been a rush of athletes, such as Olympic medallist Ezekiel Sepeng, recently falling foul of authorities, despite career-killing censure.

School children, under pressure to perform, are also turning to drugs, striving for a bastardised version of the Olympic maxim — swifter, higher, stronger.

Studies document significant sports-drug abuse among schoolchildren, with anabolic steroids the most common.

”There is pressure from old boys, pressure from parents, pressure from the community plus the internal pressure from school,” said Frans van Niekerk, head coach of rugby at Paul Roos Gymnasium school in Stellenbosch.

Van Niekerk said that schools such as his, which could afford a sports psychologist and doctor to help keep pupils level-headed, were less likely to experience drug abuse.

”Kids from schools that don’t have resources, whether it’s players or equipment, they maybe need to get an edge on others … [and] they are the individuals who will take that stuff,” Van Niekerk suggested.

Implementing a national awareness programme is one of the major objectives of the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) in the next four years.

Daphne Bradbury, chief executive of SAIDS, said in response to numerous anecdotal reports of steroid abuse among schoolboy rugby players earlier this year, that she had discussions with both SA Rugby and school-rugby festival organisers.

”And we will be implementing an anti-doping education programme aimed at schools throughout the country, prior to conducting any testing at these events in the future,” she said.

Bradbury said it was in the interests of both the sport and schools that rumours be laid to rest, and the values of fair play be reflected on the sports field.

According to research from a 1999 survey among high school children, 1 136 Grade 12 pupils were screened among some Cape Town schools, and another 1 411 from schools in Johannesburg.

The results showed that Johannesburg pupils were far more likely to use anabolic androgenic steroids, at 22,7 per 1 000 compared with the Cape’s 5,9 per 1 000.

Boys were more prone to use steroids, which were obtained, almost equally, from gymnasium instructors, friends at gym, on the team or at school.

The main sport for which steroids was taken was body building, followed by rugby. Other sports included basketball, athletics, field hockey and swimming.

Bradbury said sports federations should be more active in collaborating with the institute to create awareness among their athletes about anti-doping rules.

”Athletes have to know the playing rules and regulations of their sport, and so there is absolutely no reason or excuse for them not knowing the anti-doping rules and regulations as well,” she said.

As the World Anti-Doping Agency stresses, ignorance is no excuse. This is worrying because a survey of the South African team at the 1998 Commonwealth Games showed a staggering 80% of athletes were unaware of the classification of IOC-banned substances listed in the Guide for Drug Free Sport.

”Forty-three percent were of the opinion that the use of drugs in South Africa was on the increase. This survey was repeated in 2002 with better results,” reads part of the SAIDS new strategic plan.

In the 2006 to 2009 strategic plan, the SAIDS, which is the only recognised body in the country with the authority to enforce a national anti-doping strategy, notes a number of opportunities and threats.

Among the threats are apathy and ignorance (of) doctors and pharmacists; new substances that cannot be detected; court challenges by lawyers; and an increased use of performance-enhancing drugs outside organised sport.

The chairperson of the anti-doping commission of the South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (Sascoc), Dr George van Dugteren, said many countries were slow to ratify the International Convention Against Doping — a step required to give legal force to the convention.

Only seven countries, excluding South Africa, have ratified this to date.

”Not only must governments still come on board … but many athletes and governing bodies are becoming disenchanted with certain aspects of the code and its associated international standards that place too much emphasis on relatively unimportant issues,” said Van Dugteren.

One of these is the time and resources spent on testing for the use of anti-inflammatory cortisone-like preparations or beta-2 agonists (asthma inhalers), which many believed were not really performance-enhancing.

”It is hoped that sanity will prevail and appropriate modification will be made to the code when it comes up for revision in 2007,” said Van Dugteren.

He said mankind was ”inherently competitive” in nature, and it was clear to him that the battle against cheating in sport will continue for a ”very long time”. — Sapa