/ 7 December 2006

Spam is back with a vengeance

Most internet users already know it: spam is on the rise again as the senders of unwanted e-mail advertisements find new ways to circumvent filtering systems.

A study released last month by the security firm Postini found that unwanted messages now account for 91% of all e-mail, and over the past 12 months the daily volume of spam rose by 120%.

A separate report by California-based IronPort Systems concluded that worldwide spam volumes increased from 31-billion messages daily in October 2005 to 61-billion messages per day in October 2006.

Security experts cite two key reasons for the surge, which has come after a brief respite in which spam appeared to be stabilising.

First, spammers are using massive networks of hijacked computers called “bot-nets” to send the e-mails. Postini said more than one million infected computers are being used for spam and virus attacks each day, with 50 000 or more active at any instant.

Secondly, spammers are using more sophisticated techniques to get around filters, notably the use of “image spam”.

“This dramatic rise in spam attacks on corporate networks has the Internet under a state of siege,” said Daniel Druker, executive vice-president of marketing at Postini.

“Spammers are increasingly aggressive and sophisticated in their techniques, and protection from spam has become a front-burner issue again. Spam has evolved from a tool for nuisance hackers and annoying marketers to one for criminal enterprises.”

Image spam reached a new high of 25% of total spam volume in October 2006, an increase of 421% in a year, according to IronPort.

Paul Judge, chief technology officer of Secure Computing, said filters that use key text words, mathematical analysis or even optical recognition have become less effective against the newest spam.

“Spammers are using advanced mathematical and graphical techniques like random modification of image pixels and dynamic construction of images from multiple components to bypass spam filtering tools,” he said.

Spam can reap profits for the senders in a variety of ways. The messages can simply offer a product for sale, such as Viagra or other pharmaceuticals; they can include fraudulent pitches for money or direct users to a fake “phishing” website to glean financial information or passwords; or they can include attachments that will infect computers, allowing them to be used to relay more spam.

Security group PandaLabs says a major new type of spam aims to push sales of stocks in a certain company.

“The objective of this attack is to push up these stock prices,” PandaLabs said, saying the messages appear to be coordinated to boost a particular share price to make profits.

“It is more than likely that the creator of these messages has bought these stocks for cheap and aims to make a quick profit by pushing the value up,” said Luis Corrons, director of PandaLabs.

“The greatest danger in these types of attacks is that just as they can push prices up a bit, they can also cause them to drop. This could become a dangerous tool if used, say, as a weapon against a group of investors or a specific company.”

The latest developments dashed hopes for victory in the battle on spam. A US law known as the CAN-SPAM act of 2003 has only had a limited impact. A claim by Microsoft chairman Bill Gates in 2004 that the problem would be “under control within two years” also proved illusory.

California security firm McAfee said some spammers now use “island-hopping,” directing messages from the domain names of small islands to disguise themselves from filters that traditionally catch more well-known domains.

McAfee traced spam activity from the Isle of Man to the tiny tropical island of Tokelau in the South Pacific.

Other areas whose domains are being used include Tuvalu, Tonga, and Sao Tome and Principe.

“This new trend is another example of spammers’ relentless quest to spread their abuse of Internet domains far and wide,” said Guy Roberts, a McAfee researcher. “Some of these islands have dozens of spammed domains per square mile.”