/ 15 July 2007

Tripoli meeting seeks to unify Darfur jumble

The United Nations and African Union host a meeting in Tripoli on Sunday to evaluate the troubled peace process in Sudan’s war-torn Darfur, which is bedevilled by fragmented rebel groups and competing initiatives.

The meeting brings together those countries and organisations trying to end the four-year conflict, and aims to unify competing peace initiatives and set the stage for negotiations, UN Sudan envoy Jan Eliasson said.

In recent months, Eliasson and his AU counterpart, Salim Ahmed Salim, have led four missions to Sudan and had numerous contacts with rebel groups and neighbouring countries.

Last week, following their latest mission, Eliasson expressed optimism that ”the moment of truth” for Darfur was approaching as efforts were unified. He said invitations for final negotiations could be sent out as early as September.

”I think the next month or two are going to be absolutely crucial for the future of Darfur,” Eliasson said on Saturday.

The AU said Salim has extracted a commitment from rebel chief Khalil Ibrahim of the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) ”to take part in all future negotiations aimed at completing the process of creating a final and lasting peace in Darfur”.

The government, which has been accused of sponsoring a genocidal crackdown on the rebels via the Janjaweed militia, has assured the UN that it does not seek a military solution to the problem.

Since rebels took up arms in 2003 complaining of marginalisation by Khartoum, the UN estimates about 200 000 people have been killed and two million displaced.

A May 2006 peace deal failed to stem the fighting. Only one rebel group signed on and then promptly split into competing, if not outright antagonistic, factions, further complicating the negotiating process. The JEM is one of the groups that has so far refused to sign the agreement.

UN and AU negotiators are in near daily contact with the roughly dozen rebel groups, but many have not yet agreed to join the talks, Eliasson said.

Ali Triki, the head of the Africa desk at the Libyan Foreign Ministry, said on Saturday that ”representatives of most of the Sudanese rebel movements are also in Tripoli for talks on the sidelines of the conference”.

”The meeting will fix a date for the start of negotiations with the rebel groups that did not sign the Abuja accord” last year, he added.

Rebel alliance

Five Darfur rebel factions formed a new alliance on Saturday in Asmara to present a united front for peace negotiations with Khartoum. ”Following extensive and continuous discussions, the movements agreed [to establish] a united front to deal with the crisis in Darfur and the Sudan, and appeal to all other movements to unify efforts,” they said in a statement.

But several major rebel groups, including the SLM faction of founder Abdel Wahid Nur, Mahjoub Hussein’s Greater Sudan Liberation Movement and the JEM, remain outside the new alliance.

Many competing initiatives have been presented by neighbouring countries, including Egypt, Eritrea and Libya, which could be synthesised into a single coherent approach in Tripoli, Eliasson said.

Also in attendance will be Britain, Canada, Chad, China, France, The Netherlands, Norway, Russia, the United States, the Arab League, the European Union and Sudan.

Eritrean President Issaias Afworki said in Asmara on Saturday that his country had called for ”stepped-up endeavours, so that the Tripoli meeting may reach a joint consensus to resolve the Darfur issue”.

The meeting comes as the UN examines a revised Security Council draft resolution authorising a joint peacekeeping force in Darfur for an initial period of 12 months to replace the embattled AU force.

It says the proposed force, to be known as Unamid, will ”consist of up to 19 555 military personnel and an appropriate civilian component including up to 3 772 police personnel”.

The ill-equipped and underfunded AU force of 7 000 soldiers has been unable to stem the violence and is often targeted by the warring parties.

”We have had success recently with the decision on the hybrid force and the progress on the peacekeeping side, and we definitely now need to move on the political arena,” Eliasson said on Saturday. — Sapa-AFP