Eskom’s Gupta ties continue to be probed at Zondo inquiry

More details on Eskom’s Gupta linked coal contracts are expected to emerge on Tuesday as two more witnesses from the power utility take the stand.

Snehal Nagar and Gert Opperman from Eskom’s primary energy division will testify at the Zondo commission of inquiry into state capture on Tuesday. It is expected that their evidence will deal with the controversial Optimum coal mine deal.

Last week the commission, chaired by Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, heard evidence of how the utility allegedly supported the Guptas’ mining interests when it seemingly backed their 2016 acquisition of Optimum coal mine from mining giant Glencore.

Glencore executive Clinton Ephron detailed the events that led to Optimum going into business rescue, ultimately making the mine easy pickings for the Saxonwold family.

Eskom allegedly financially crippled Optimum, which was the primary supplier of coal to the utility’s Hendrina power station, by subjecting the mine to more than R2-billion in penalties for allegedly delivering poor-quality coal and refusing to pay for coal until the penalties had been settled.

It is expected that Nagar and Opperman’s evidence will deal with the origin of these penalties against Glencore and how they were calculated.

National Treasury’s damning report on alleged corruption at Eskom found that the power utility’s management prejudiced Glencore by refusing to sign a negotiated coal contract, giving an advantage to Oakbay to acquire all assets in Optimum coal mine.

According to the report, former Eskom executive Matshela Koko paved the way for the Gupta family’s acquisition of the allegedly loss-making Optimum coal mine.

The penalties levied against the mine under Glencore were allegedly radically reduced by Eskom once the Guptas took over.

Nagar’s testimony is also expected to deal with how the acquisition was helped along by a R659-million prepayment to Oakbay from Eskom. The prepayment by the power utility, which was paid just three days after a late-night special board tender committee resolution to pay it, helped the Guptas with their mine.

Without that resolution the infamous Gupta family, which had been denied loans by banks just hours before, would have missed the deadline to deposit the R 2.1-billion required to conclude the transaction.

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Sarah Smit
Sarah Smit
Sarah Smit is a general news reporter at the Mail & Guardian. She covers topics relating to labour, corruption and the law.

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Latest stories

OPINION | What will power Mthethwa’s erection?

Since Eskom’s a no-go, perhaps our Minister of Monuments’ R22-m flag will be powered on arrogance and self-belief alone

Shutterland: photographers’ journeys through everyday life in South Africa

Through their lenses, 22 South African photographers tell personal stories that show how life in South Africa is built on duality

The Cat enters the ANC fray: David Mabuza speaks out

In an interview with the M&G deputy president David Mabuza ponders his political future but insists ‘it’s the branches that choose the leaders’

OPINION | Climate change: We are wedded to our own...

Although the answers are not simple, the warnings have been coming for more than three decades and yet leaders are still not doing what must be done
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×