DA granted permission to use its own seal on May 8 ballot boxes

The Democratic Alliance (DA) has been granted permission to apply its own seal to ballot boxes during the upcoming general election, which the party says will help protect the integrity of the results.

The Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) says the Electoral Act allows political parties to attach their own seals to ballot boxes to ensure they are not tampered with.

In the aftermath of the 2014 election, ballot boxes were found in various areas of Gauteng — namely Alexandra, Diepsloot and Lynnwood Ridge — according to reports at the time.

READ MORE: IEC: Election wasn’t perfect, but it was free and fair

Although no fraud was found to have been committed, the IEC admitted at the time that the procedure set out to handle the ballot boxes after the votes were counted had not been followed. Following the discovery, the Economic Freedom Fighters alleged that the result in Gauteng was rigged, although there was no proof of this.

The May 8 polls are expected to be closely fought, particularly in provinces such as Gauteng and the North West, where every vote cast will count to determine who governs. The governing party’s own polling in Gauteng shows that the province could swing either way, with its support standing at 50% among registered voters.

The Mail & Guardian understands that the DA will apply its own seals to ballot boxes, which the party itself will break when the votes are counted. According to sources within the party, this is being done to “protect votes” and assist in ensuring the credibility of the result.

In response to questions from the M&G, the IEC confirmed this.

“It is correct that political parties may bring their own seals and attach to full ballot boxes, as prescribed in the Electoral Act. This has been the case in all elections,” the commission said.

READ MORE: IEC stays calm in the face of chaos

The aim of the seal on ballot boxes is to ensure that the ballot boxes are not tampered with. The commission also provides seals for all ballot boxes.

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Natasha Marrian
Natasha Marrian
Marrian has built a reputation as an astute political journalist, investigative reporter and commentator. Until recently she led the political team at Business Day where she also produced a widely read column that provided insight into the political spectacle of the week.

Related stories


Subscribers only

How lottery execs received dubious payments through a private company

The National Lottery Commission is being investigated by the SIU for alleged corruption and maladministration, including suspicious payments made to senior NLC employees between 2016 and 2017

Pandemic hobbles learners’ futures

South African schools have yet to open for the 2021 academic year and experts are sounding the alarm over lost learning time, especially in the crucial grades one and 12

More top stories

Zuma, Zondo play the waiting game

The former president says he will talk once the courts have ruled, but the head of the state capture inquiry appears resigned to letting the clock run out as the commission's deadline nears

Disinformation harms health and democracy

Conspiracy theorists abuse emotive topics to suck the air out of legitimate debate and further their own sinister agendas

Uganda: ‘I have never seen this much tear-gas in an...

Counting was slow across Uganda as a result of the internet shutdown, which affected some of the biometric machines used to validate voter registrations.

No way out for Thales in arms deal case, court...

The arms manufacturer has argued that there was no evidence to show that it was aware of hundreds of indirect payments to Jacob Zuma, but the court was not convinced.

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…