Another loss for Mkhwebane: Ramaphosa acted ‘rationally’ in awaiting Gordhan review

 

 

In yet another court defeat for the Public Protector, the high court on Thursday ordered in favour of President Cyril Rampahosa in his battle against advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane over her report into the early pension pay-out to former Sars deputy commissioner, Ivan Pillay.

In her report, Mkhwebane found that the approval of the pay-out, with full benefits, by then finance minister Pravin Gordhan, was irregular. She instructed the president to take appropriate disciplinary action against Gordhan.

Gordhan then challenged the report in court on review.

The president locked horns with Mkhwebane when he wrote to her saying that, since there was no time limit specified in her remedial action, the appropriate course of action was to await the outcome of Gordhan’s review process. But Mkhwebane — supported in court by the Economic Freedom Fighters — argued that this was effectively not implementing the remedial action. The proper course of action was for Gordhan to have sought an interim interdict, she argued.

On Thursday, Judge Molopa-Sethosa said the president’s approach was “rational and reasonable”. She said it was not comparable to what former President Jacob Zuma did when he was directed to pay back some of the costs of upgrading his Nkandla homestead, which was to institute a “parallel process” by Parliament.

The judge said it was unreasonable to demand that the president must take action “without having regard to a pending court review”.

READ MORE: Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane loses, again

Molopa-Sethosa’s judgment and the interim interdict by Judge Sulet Potteril last month over Mkhwebane’s “rogue unit” report have together put on ice any immediate steps against Gordhan — and will give some breathing room to the president and Gordhan as Gordhan and Pillay proceed with their review applications in the long term.

Ramaphosa is also in another, separate, battlewith Mkhwebane over her Bosasa report, which found that he had deliberately misled Parliament over a donation to the CR17 ANC presidential campaign and breached the executive ethics code by not disclosing all his donation to Parliament.

READ MORE: Public Protector won’t oppose Ramaphosa’s interdict application in Bosasa matter

This week, Mkhwebane said she would not oppose his application for an urgent interim interdict as he had also asked that the main review case be heard urgently.

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Franny Rabkin
Franny Rabkin
Franny is the legal reporter at the Mail & Guardian

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Latest stories

Suicide cases soar in Zimbabwe

The economic crisis in the country appears to be pushing people over the mental edge

OPINION| New UK work visa to exclude graduates from Africa

If graduates did not get their qualifications from the list of top 50 universities, 40 of which are in the US, France, China, Hong Kong, Australia, Germany, Canada and Japan, they will be excluded

Hackers infiltrate SA illicit financial flows conference with porn clip

The conference was attended by state agencies, blue- chip global and local non-governmental agencies and public accountability experts

OPINION| South African audiences want more authentic and accurate diversity...

The media has the power to shape perceptions, so television shows and movies can help shape a positive view of people who feel stereotyped
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×