Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Busi, Absa and costly spelling slips



A series of errors saw public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane serving Absa with a subpoena intended for FNB. This happened during her investigation into corruption-tainted Bosasa’s R500 000 donation to the CR17 ANC presidential election campaign and whether President Cyril Ramaphosa had misled Parliament about it.

Since the release of her report into the allegations of violations of the executive ethics code through improper relations between Ramaphosa and Bosasa, Mkhwebane and her office have consistently maintained that Absa was served with a subpoena for the Edelstein, Farber and Grobler account, the lawyers’ trust account used for the CR17 campaign.

In an interview with the SABC late last month, Mkhwebane said: “We have subpoenaed the records; they’ve never responded. I have proof, so we never received these records from them.

“We received the records through other investigative processes which we followed. We have done our work, we have all the evidence, I can even produce those subpoenas. We have got proof that they were delivered and we didn’t receive any response from them.”

Despite these assertions, email communications between the protector’s office and Absa tell a story of a comedy of errors, with wrong email addresses being used. The emails show that, on February 4, Absa received a physical subpoena that was meant for FirstRand Group’s head of fraud risk management. The subpoena had been signed by Mkhwebane on January 29.

The following day, February 5, Nonkululeko Dunga, the personal assistant to Marthinus Janse van Rensburg, Absa’s general counsel for legal services, wrote to the public protector’s chief investigator, Rodney Mataboge, saying: “Please note that Marthinus has received an incorrect subpoena that was supposed to be sent to FNB. Please can you courier the correct one that is meant for Absa.”

But Dunga missed one letter in the email address, which resulted in it never reaching Mkhwebane’s office.

Also, Mataboge’s email on February 4, which was a follow-up to the physical subpoena, never got to Van Rensburg because he too had typed the email address incorrectly.

Between February and the release of Mkhwebane’s report last month, there was no further communication or attempts at communication between Absa and the public protector. And there is no proof of any person at Absa signing for the receipt of any subpoena.

This has led to an impasse between the two parties, with Mkhwebane stating during the release of her report that Absa had refused to co-operate. Her spokesperson, Oupa Segalwe, previously said: “When Absa was not forthcoming with regard to the subpoena that was served on it, we did not pursue them because we were able to obtain the same information through the FIC [Financial Intelligence Centre]. It is the statutory body that has access to those things.”

The public protector’s office did not respond to a request for information about who had received and signed for the subpoena at Absa.

In an email to Mkhwebane on July 23, Absa demanded a copy of the subpoena she insisted was served on the bank. “In this respect, our records reflect that your offices attempted to serve an invalid subpoena that was addressed to First Rand Bank, dated 29 January 2019, on Absa … We are sure that you will appreciate that it would be irregular for Absa to act on an invalid subpoena,” said Steven Palmer, head of Absa Africa’s litigation section. Mkhwebane’s office responded with an e-mail attaching the February subpoena that Absa says it never received. It only got the one intended for FNB.

The impasse between Absa and the protector has led to Ramaphosa’s office questioning the legality of how the CR17 bank records were obtained. Presidential spokesperson Khusela Diko said: “The reason we say that is, in her report, the public protector had listed a subpoena to Absa bank and FNB as being the sources of information she had regarding those bank accounts. Absa is on record having said that they have not received a subpoena from the public protector. Now, the question stands: Where did the public protector get those bank statements?”

She added that the public protector “also did not list Standard Bank as one of the banks that she has subpoenaed, but she has bank accounts of the Ria Tenda Trust, which banks with Standard Bank … now, where did she get that information?”

The president’s legal team has since asked the high court that certain documents in Mkhwebane’s report be sealed to protect confidential banking information.

The embattled public protector has fought claims that she obtained this information illegally, stating that she had sought the assistance of the FIC, which had handed over the bank account information to her office.

It is unclear whether the FIC did ask Absa for the information that is now in Mkhwebane’s possession, as required by law and as stated in the FIC Act section 27.

The FIC did not respond to questions about whether it had requested the information from Absa.

Segalwe said the allegations that Mkhwebane had obtained information illegally was part of an attempt to taint the protector. “Every bank record that had a bearing on the investigation or which involved the donations was obtained from the FIC [Financial Intelligence Centre].”

This was done in terms of a memorandum of understanding entered into by the FIC and the public protector, he said.

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Thanduxolo Jika
Thanduxolo Jika

Thanduxolo Jika is an investigative Journalist and Co-Author of We are going to kill each other today:The Marikana Story. The Messiah of Abantu.

Related stories


If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Subscribers only

R270m ‘housing heist’ bid deprives people of decent homes

After alleged attempts to loot Eastern Cape housing funds, 39 200 people in the province will continue to live in atrocious conditions

Cabinet reshuffle not on cards yet

There are calls for the president to act against ministers said to be responsible for the state’s slow response to the unrest, but his hands are tied

More top stories

R270m ‘housing heist’ bid deprives people of decent homes

After alleged attempts to loot Eastern Cape housing funds, 39 200 people in the province will continue to live in atrocious conditions

Stolen ammo poses security threat amid failure to protect high-risk...

A Durban depot container with 1.5-million rounds of ammunition may have been targeted, as others in the vicinity were left untouched, say security sources

Sierra Leoneans want a share of mining profits, or they...

The arrival of a Chinese gold mining company in Kono, a diamond-rich district in the east of Sierra Leone, had a devastating impact on the local community, cutting its water supply and threatening farmers’ livelihoods – and their attempts to seek justice have been frustrated at every turn

IEC to ask the courts to postpone local elections

The chairperson of the Electoral Commission of South Africa said the Moseneke inquiry found that the elections would not be free and fair if held in October

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…