Artificially dimming the sun may reduce the risk of future droughts in Cape Town

Injecting tiny, reflective particles of sulphur dioxide into the upper atmosphere to artificially dim the sun could help reduce the likelihood of Day Zero-level droughts in Cape Town by up to 90% in the future.

This is according to the findings of a new research paper from the University of Cape Town, in collaboration with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and the National Center for Atmospheric Research in the US, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

The authors assessed the potential impact of controversial solar radiation management (SRM) geo­engineering using stratospheric aerosols injection (SAI) to offset the risk of Day Zero-level droughts in a high-emission future using climate model simulations from the Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project. 

According to the research team, if implemented, this would involve blocking a small amount of solar radiation from reaching the Earth’s surface by, for example, injecting reflective aerosols into the upper atmosphere to counteract rising temperatures.

“Our findings suggest that keeping the global mean temperature at 2020 levels through SAI would offset the projected end-century risk of Day Zero-level droughts by approximately 90%, keeping the risk of such droughts similar to today’s level,” the team writes in their paper. 


It describes how the Western Cape experienced extreme multi-year drought in 2015–2017, causing the most severe water shortage experienced by the province in more than a century.

“While Day Zero was avoided through a mix of drastic reductions in water usage (by nearly 50%) and short-term supply augmentation, the drought was termed the ‘new normal’, implying that climate change was acting to move the region towards semi-permanent drought-like conditions.”

However, in a December 2018 paper, science advocacy group Climate Analytics emphasised SRM is not a solution to the climate problem as it does not address the drivers of human-induced climate change and is a “potentially dangerous interference with the climate system”.

“SRM would strongly alter the climate system producing ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ in different regions and with different levels of deployment. It would, therefore, most likely become a source of a massive conflict between nations. If not banned altogether, it would put the power of triggering a climate shock into the hands of single actors,” reads that report.

SRM is one class of geoengineering and has its limits, including masking the warming effect of greenhouse gases.

“Our findings suggest that SRM could help to lower future risks of severe droughts in Cape Town,” lead author Dr Romaric C Odoulami of the African Climate and Development Initiative said in a statement. 

The findings must be seen in context, however. “A change of location, model, or SRM deployment design might produce significantly different results.”

The researchers stress such methods should not be viewed as an alternative to cutting emissions, and there are several “less risky” climate actions to help limit future Day Zero drought risk.

The study on SMR is part of a more comprehensive project through the Developing Country Impacts Modelling Analysis for SRM (Decimals) fund.

Earlier this year, studies funded by Decimals from South Africa and Benin found that SRM might be able to reduce the impacts of climate change across most regions of Africa, but not all.  

Another study found that parts of West Africa could be worse off if sun dimming were used to combat climate change, “underlining the fact that SRM is likely to be contested and highly controversial even if it can reduce climate change impacts for most people”.

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Sheree Bega
Sheree Bega is an environment reporter at the Mail & Guardian.

Related stories

Advertising

Subscribers only

Q&A Sessions: Marcia Mayaba —Driven to open doors for women

Marcia Mayaba has been in the motor industry for 24 years, donning hats that include receptionist, driver, fuel attendant, dealer principal and now chief...

The war on women in video game culture

Women and girls make up almost half of the gaming community but are hardly represented and face abuse in the industry

More top stories

Mysteries behind Battle of Bangui

A new book offers unprecedented insight into South Africa’s strange relationship with the Central African Republic

Gatvol Capetonians, EFF lash out at City of Cape Town...

Public infrastructure was allegedly damaged by the activist group in 2019 and by the Economic Freedom Fighters in 2020

Masuku loses appeal against SIU report on Covid graft

The judge found that when news of improprieties were brought to his attention, Masuku did not take steps to urgently intervene

Leaking De Ruyter’s affidavit countering racism claims was ‘malicious’ and...

Mkhuleko Hlengwa has pointed to people in Eskom or the public enterprises department for making the document public
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…