New tool finds best places to build wind farms to protect birds of prey

There’s a dark side to renewable energy: wind turbine blades kill birds and bats. Birds of prey such as eagles, buzzards and vultures are particularly vulnerable because they use the same wind resources that the turbines need to operate. 

Last year, one study found that more than 800 birds had died between 2014 and 2018 after being struck at 20 wind farms in South Africa. Birds of prey comprised 36% of the carcasses. Between 2015 and 2019, 14 adult and five juvenile Verreaux’s eagles were reported killed by wind turbines. 

Now a team from the University of Cape Town, the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, HawkWatch International, and the University of Amsterdam have pioneered a new tool — the Verreaux’s Eagle Risk Assessment (Vera) — that enables developers to identify the best locations to build wind farms and reduce the risk of the eagles being killed.

Found in mountainous areas, the Verreaux’s eagle, previously called the black eagle or witkruisarend because of its colour and a V on its back, is particularly vulnerable to collisions with wind turbines, whose outer blade tips spin at speeds of up to 290km an hour. 

As birds of prey have long lifespans, and produce relatively few young each year, even a small increase in deaths can lead to population decline, the researchers say.


The researchers say it’s not clear if birds don’t see the moving blades or don’t perceive them as a threat.

With the rapid growth of wind energy developments worldwide, “it is critical that the negative impacts on wildlife are considered and mitigated”, write the authors in their study, which was published earlier this month in the Journal of Applied Ecology

To minimise collisions, developers usually try to build wind turbines away from areas in “high use” by birds of prey, or they create simple buffers around a nest. But these exclusion buffers are not working. 

Lead author Megan Murgatroyd, of HawkWatch International, says that by using the predictive model to account for how these eagles use their habitats a greater area of land can be made available for wind energy development without increased mortality risk for raptors.

“Circular exclusion buffers have been ineffective compared to our models, firstly because they have been variable in size, with some developers applying buffers as small as 800m radius; to work, they need to be much larger than that,” says avian conservation biologist Arjun Amar, an associate professor at the FitzPatrick Institute and co-author of the study. “They also assume that the eagles will use the space around their nest sites in a uniform and circular manner, which is obviously not going to be the case.”

Vera’s models use data from GPS tracking devices attached to 15 Verreaux’s eagles across South Africa that was gathered by Murgatroyd over the past eight years.

The tracking devices, developed at the University of Amsterdam, provide a record of where and how high a bird is flying every three seconds.

“When we started this project, most tags available collected a location once per hour; while we were collecting track up to every three seconds,” she explains. “Tracking technology has since improved a lot, but this is still probably the highest resolution data set for any African eagle.”

Sam Ralston-Paton, the birds and renewable energy project manager at BirdLife South Africa, explains that the 2019 Integrated Resource Plan makes provision for 17 700 megawatts for wind energy by 2030. 

By then, about 22% of installed capacity should come from wind energy and this could mean more than 35 000 birds will be killed each year, including about 1 500 raptors. 

As well as the Verreaux’s eagle, other threatened species affected by wind farms in South Africa include vultures, martial eagles and black harriers.

“These risks can be avoided, or at least minimised, with the considered location of wind turbines. Location is the most effective and cost-effective mitigation strategy. Fortunately, much of South Africa has excellent wind resources, and we have many alternative locations for wind energy available for consideration,” says Ralston-Paton.

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Sheree Bega
Sheree Bega is an environment reporter at the Mail & Guardian.

Related stories

Advertising

Subscribers only

Ithala fails to act against board chairperson over PPE scandal

Morar asked to settle with the state and pay back the profit he made on an irregular tender

Vodacom swindled out of more than R24m worth of iPhones

A former employee allegedly ran an intricate scam to steal 8700 phones from the cellular giant

More top stories

Investigate crimes in Tigray now, or risk a fragmented Ethiopia

For any investigation to be successful, evidence must be collected before it degrades

A Gauteng firm is using bioplastics to limit microplastics

Humans eat, drink and breathe in tens of thousands of micro- and nanoplastics, but research into the effects on health is limited

Mpumalanga, Western Cape don’t comply with threatened and protected species...

The provinces cite limited capacity and funds to implement the regulations

Meet Norman Chisale, Malawi’s richest bodyguard

Norman Chisale, the former Malawian president’s security chief, is struggling to account for his enormous wealth.
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…