Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Zondo asks Constitutional Court to jail Zuma for two years for continued defiance

The Zondo commission has asked the Constitutional Court for an urgent order declaring former president Jacob Zuma in contempt of court and sentencing him to two years in prison for defying summonses served to testify before the inquiry into state capture.

The application was filed with the apex court on Monday after Zuma defied the third summons in a row from the commission, the last one to appear before it from Monday to Friday last week.

In a supporting affidavit, the secretary of the commission, Itumeleng Mosala, says Zuma “intentionally” defied the summons, which was made an order of the court in a ruling handed down on January 28.

This speaks to the requirement in law and legal precedent for defiance of a court order to be mala fides before it can lead to finding a person guilty of contempt, which is a criminal offence.

Mosala cited both the minister and national commissioner of police as respondents in the matter, following Zuma, for they are required to give effect to his arrest.

He said the commission was bringing the application before the court at “the earliest opportunity” after Friday last week, the last day to which the five-day summons applied. Zuma signalled on Monday last week that he would defy the court and the commission and launched an extraordinary attack on both the judiciary and the commission, in which he personally impugned Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo.

“Mr Zuma did not attend at all during the whole week. This application is brought immediately after the last day of the contempt of court, being February 19,” he stressed.

The 209-page court application then proceeds to deal with the former president’s ongoing attacks on the integrity of the bench, and cites these as a further reason for urgently finding him in contempt.

There was no guarantee that Zuma would cease his attacks on the judiciary and the rule of law, and it carried the risk that he would inspire others to adopt a similar stance, Mosala submitted. This carried “the grave risk” that the rule of law would be fundamentally weakened. 

“The seriousness of the threat that Mr Zuma’s conduct poses to public trust in, and respect for, the authority of the courts and the rule of law requires this court to intervene and assert its authority without delay,” the application read. 

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Subscribers only

‘Exciting’ ramp-up for Covid jabs

As more vaccines arrive in the country, South Africa could administer 420 000 doses a day

Mokgoro was party to talks of his resignation

The North West premier has defied the interim provincial committee’s decision

More top stories

‘Exciting’ ramp-up for Covid jabs

As more vaccines arrive in the country, South Africa could administer 420 000 doses a day

Mokgoro was party to talks of his resignation

The North West premier has defied the interim provincial committee’s decision

Richard Calland: Cyril’s wicked cabinet conundrum

Three weeks ago, a second term for the president seemed a safe bet, but the insurgency has thrown the puzzle pieces in the air

ConCourt finds that protection of LGBT+ rights was intrinsic to...

The court also found that the term hurtful should be excised from the Equality Act in that it did not meet the justification threshold in the Constitution and gave Parliament 24 months to do so
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×