Acting public protector Kholeka Gcaleka however found his security head Wally Rhoode had acted improperly
Suspended public protector threatens litigation unless the section 194 inquiry postpones her testimony until funds are found to cover her legal fees
But Kholeka Gcaleka has recommended that action be taken against former presidential protection service head Wally Rhoode
The president has 12 months to redraft the executive ethics code to compel the disclosure of all donations to campaigns for positions within political parties
This content is restricted to subscribers only.
Join the M&G Community
Our commitment at the Mail & Guardian is to ensure every reader enjoys the finest experience. Join the M&G community and support us in delivering in-depth news to you consistently.
Subscribe
Subscription enables:
- – M&G community membership
- – independent journalism
- – access to all premium articles & features
- – a digital version of the weekly newspaper
- – invites to subscriber-only events
- – the opportunity to test new online features first
Already a subscriber?
Login here.
The apex court agreed with one of the most scathing rulings yet against the public protector and found the president did nothing wrong
Busisiwe Mkhwebane discarded facts that were inconvenient to her when she investigated the CR17 campaign, Cyril Ramaphosa’s lawyers argued
So says public protector Busisiwe Mkwhebane’s lawyer, who said she had reason to suspect the money was being laundered through the campaign
amaBhungane’s arguments about the disclosure of campaign funding are also expected to be heard