Wikipedia wants you to join the good side of the internet

If Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales came up with the idea for a free, collaborative online encyclopedia today — when money-hungry tech giants rule the internet — it would be a hard sell. 

It was already a hard sell in 2001 when Wikipedia first made its way onto the internet, says Wikimedia South Africa board member Douglas Scott.

“When you think about it, it is a giant, open-sourced information repository that can be edited by anyone and all of these people editing and adding content to it are unpaid,” he says.

“They do it for the joy of it. They do it for the civic good of doing it … Pretty much everyone who this was presented to thought this would not work. Even many of its early believers thought it would just be a fun project.”

On Friday, Wikipedia will have been around for 20 years, exceeding expectations by becoming a widely turned to and reliable public resource. According to web-analysis firm Alexa, in South Africa, Wikipedia is the 10th-most popular site on the internet.

Wikipedia, which puts its faith into volunteers to populate it with factual content, stands out from similar community-based websites, which have often become battlegrounds of propaganda and disinformation. It has been able to guard against this because of its community’s cause, Scott says.

“Wikipedia and the free knowledge movement have shared values of providing free, accessible, reliable, trustworthy information to everyone. And the community has grown around that vision … We all have a strong consensus that things like hate speech, misinformation and disinformation are bad things that must be fought.”

Scott says Wikipedia is one of the last vestiges of a more optimistic hope for the internet. “In the early days of the internet, the hope was that the internet would be used for a source for global good — bring the world together and provide a shared platform for everyone to know each other better,” he says.

“And 20 years later that vision of the internet has not materialised, very sadly. But there are a few vestiges.”

In the age of misinformation on the internet, Wikipedia has become a trusted source used by other platforms, like Facebook, to allow users to fact-check information, Scott notes. It has also become increasingly important in the wake of Covid-19, which has been accompanied by a flood of dangerous untruths.

For Wikipedia to have a quality and range of content, it needs to have diverse editors, something that South Africa is missing. 

“We need more editors from all walks of life. There is just a blanket need for more people in South Africa voluntarily editing in South Africa … The South African community of editors is not representative of South Africa broadly,”  Scott says.

“And if we want to represent the sum of human knowledge that is accessible to everyone everywhere, and we want to do so from a neutral point of view, then we need to increase the diversity of our editors,” he adds.

The South African editor base is predominantly white and male, Scott says. They also mostly live in Gauteng and the Western Cape, which means that the South African-related content tends not to cover the rest of the country. 

Scott says that South African Wikipedia needs more content written in South African languages other than English. “This is where one person could make a huge positive difference. One person who really cares about their language,” he says. 

The internet is a fraught and sometimes scary space. But without it, Wikipedia would not find the volunteer editors it needs to exist.

“One of the really important things for us is to raise awareness in the public that Wikipedia exists and that anyone can participate in editing Wikipedia. And they are encouraged to do so,” Scott says. “They are needed on Wikipedia. And hopefully, by appealing to billions of people, we will be able to find a small number of dedicated, self-motivated volunteers.”

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Sarah Smit
Sarah Smit
Sarah Smit is a general news reporter at the Mail & Guardian. She covers topics relating to labour, corruption and the law.

Related stories


Subscribers only

Ithala fails to act against board chairperson over PPE scandal

Morar asked to settle with the state and pay back the profit he made on an irregular tender

Vodacom swindled out of more than R24m worth of iPhones

A former employee allegedly ran an intricate scam to steal 8700 phones from the cellular giant

More top stories

South Africa to get another commission, this one to tackle...

A higher carbon tax will be introduced in 2023 for companies with dangerous levels of greenhouse gas emissions

Zondo deplores ‘attempted killing’ of state capture witness who implicated...

The deputy chief justice says an attack on one witness may deter many others from giving evidence

Investigate crimes in Tigray now, or risk a fragmented Ethiopia

For any investigation to be successful, evidence must be collected before it degrades

A Gauteng firm is using bioplastics to limit microplastics

Humans eat, drink and breathe in tens of thousands of micro- and nanoplastics, but research into the effects on health is limited

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…